A federal judge is steamed at the State Department enough to accuse them of legal “bad faith.” Shockingly, he signed an order directing the interrogation of Hillary Clinton about her infamous emails. The former Secretary of State will be grilled unmercifully by lawyers for the conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch. Judge Lamberth has a few sharply pointed questions of his own, so Cheryl Mills will also get a session in the hot seat, along with two unnamed “State Department technology managers.” This is absolutely huge.

A long overdue interrogation

On Monday, federal judge Judge Royce Lamberth said enough is enough. For the past six years, the Deep-State Department has been acting in “bad faith.” It’s time to come up with some answers and he wants them in the next 75 days. The State Department, he explained, acted in bad faith by lying to Judicial Watch when they swore up and down that “no records existed.” Then, late last year, they suddenly discovered “30 Clinton emails that were previously undisclosed.”

Judicial Watch asked the court for permission to depose Clinton, top aide Cheryl Mills and other former State Department employees in a case which has been trying to pry public records from the State Department for over six years. A “deposition” is a formal interrogation under oath in a lawyer’s office ahead of the court trial. The judge agreed to allow every one of the depositions Judicial Watch asked for. “Any further discovery should focus on whether she used a private server to evade [the Freedom of Information Act] and, as a corollary to that, what she understood about State’s records management obligations,” the Judge wrote. The group may also move forward with a subpoena to Google for “records related to Clinton’s email while she was secretary of state.”

The judge is convinced that Hillary Clinton is hiding evidence. “The Court is not confident that State currently possesses every Clinton email recovered by the FBI.” How could they if they were on the private server she had “wiped” with Bleachbit. “Even years after the FBI investigation, the slow trickle of new emails has yet to be explained,” Lamberth notes. “For this reason, the Court believes the subpoena [to Google] would be worthwhile and may even uncover additional previously undisclosed emails.”


The judge has questions of his own

At the hearing on Monday, Lamberth laid out a whole slew of excellent questions that every conservative American would love to hear the answer to. “How did she arrive at her belief that her private server emails would be preserved by normal State Department processes for email retention?” Was one. Were they supposed to sync up her bathroom server with their own? probably not. “Did she realize State was giving ‘no records’ responses to FOIA requests for her emails? If so, did she suspect that she had any obligation to disclose the existence of her private server to those at State handling the FOIA requests?” More likely, she simply ignored it because after all, laws are for the little people.

Another thing Lamberth wants answered is “When did she first learn that State’s records management employees were unaware of the existence of her private server? And why did she think that using a private server to conduct State Department business was permissible under the law in the first place?” Hillary has some “‘splainin” to do in her upcoming interrogation.

Judicial Watch founder Tom Fitton is absolutely thrilled. “Judicial Watch uncovered the Clinton email scandal and we’re pleased that the court authorized us to depose Mrs. Clinton directly on her email conduct and how it impacted the people’s ‘right to know’ under FOIA.” Clinton’s lawyers are hiding from reporters and “didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.”

10 Responses

  1. James Frobe

    Good Morning America. Most of you have no idea who I am, or why you should pay any attention to anything I say… Well, here’s my best answer to that . I am a conservative, patriotic American. I am older n dirt. I am agast [sp] ( bet ya haven’t heard THAT word in a while) at what is going on in America these days! Good being called evil,evil being called good. I’m sure I have heard that before somewhere…OH!, yeah, now I remember… It is about predicting “end times” Well, anyway. My position today is that America has been hijacked by dangerous , evil, People. People that want to do away with the common sense laws that have kept America and Americans safe from bad things. Mrs Clinton has been evading the spirit of the law for decades. I am certain she feels justified in doing so but THAT belief is a sure sign to me that MRS Clinton AND her sleazebag husband NEED to be brought before the appropriate tribunal to answer the many questions surrounding them. You may remember an old cliche… where there is smoke there is fire. Mrs Clinton has been spewing smoke over her activities for far too long, folks. Well, there ya have it… MY views on today’s “big-shot” alleged mis conduct while in a position of trust. Be well, be safe and be nice to one another.

  2. Dave

    There is more than enough evidence to put this pathetic subhuman in jail! What is the justice system waiting for?

  3. Michael Keane

    The American People are under assault. The weapon is counterfeiting.
    President Trump is under assault. The deep state is desperate to conceal Eric Holder’s law firm, Covington Burling created the counterfeiting mechanism and the fact that weapon is used to capitalize America’s enemies.

    In 1993, the Clinton Administration enacted the “Futures’ Trades Practices Act” and then followed with the “Commodities Modernization Futures’ Act”. Each concern themselves with bets concocted in insider trading. The bets are aka, “derivatives”. The domestic criminals making these bets work hand-in-hand with foreign criminal bankers using derivatives’ fraud platforms to counterfeit American real estate.

    The Clinton Administration enacted the FTPA and the CMFA. Hillary Clinton stripped Americans of Bankruptcy protections in order to become the Senator for Wall Street in ground zero fraud – New York City.

    When the derivatives bets are assembled in pools, they are used to attack Fannie and Freddie (F&F) and pensions and investments that pay off when F&F remain solvent. In 2008, despite the fact F&F were solvent and in fact, prospering, the Obama Administration placed F&F in a bogus “Conservatorship” that is used to defraud in derivatives bets. These “Futures'” derivatives’ bets are booked in English, French and German “trust” mechanisms. John Titus, a federal prosecutor gives one example in Hong Kong Shanghai Banking Corporation (HSBC – English banking fraud). The video is here: https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=all+the+plenarys+men&view=detail&mid=D7A4E24347FCEE87F280D7A4E24347FCEE87F280&FORM=VIRE

  4. mike

    I’D send her to Gitmo to be waterboarded. there she will have no choice but tell the truth.

  5. Herrmann Glockler

    High time to expose the corruption of the entire Clinton dynasty and their apparent immunity from federal prosecution.
    The protection they enjoyed for their multitude of crimes while in office must be exposed, if this nation is to survive

  6. Sharron

    If “I remember correctly,” every time Hillary Clinton is “drilled” or “interrogated on a subject that could incriminate her, her response is always “I don’t remember.” According to attorneys I have talked to, there is no crime in “not remembering.” There is a crime if you lie to the courts or you lie to Congress or other government boards where testimony is warranted.

    I expect that will happen here, too. In fact, Clinton was so successful with her “I don’t remember” answers that others who were being interviewed or interrogated started using the same statement.

  7. Nelson W. Lentz

    Forget the interrogation.
    Why question a professional liar?
    Anyone who doesn’t think that Hillary Clinton will have an army of top lawyers advising her on what to say and what not to say to avoid being found guilty of treson, espionage, and murder has not been paying attention.
    An amble amount of evidence for those crimes is, and long has been, readily available.
    All that is needed is a judge and lawyers with backbones to take the approprite legal action, get her convicted, and sentenced to death according to the law.
    The law……..?


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.