We all know how Twitter immediately blocked the Twitter account of Donald Trump after posting an alleged violation influence that caused the Capitol riot earlier this year. I mean, do they have the right to do that without any clause?

Recently, Hunter Biden has been involved in a controversial business dealing by using his name and influence to win business deals. That’s really something we have to look at, right? but suddenly, New York Times quietly deleted its assertion that an October article from the New York Post about the business dealings of Joe Biden’s son Hunter was “unsubstantiated.”

Clean work, right?

Speaking of the devil, one of the Federal Election Commission members who rejected a claim that Twitter violated campaign finance laws by censoring The Post’s reporting on Hunter Biden’s laptop said that the social media giant may have been biased in favor of then-candidate Joe Biden but did not break the law.

Republican commissioner Sean Cooksey issued a three-page justification of his vote to reject the complaint by the Republican National Committee, saying that he thought Twitter may have had political motives in censoring the articles, but that it did not rise to the level of an in-kind contribution to Biden’s presidential campaign against incumbent President Donald Trump.

Then Cooksey expressed his doubt that Twitter was neutral in its coverage and simply following standard company practices.

“The Commission’s approved Factual and Legal Analysis concludes that Twitter was simply enforcing preexisting, commercially reasonable policies to protect its product quality and business interests. According to the Commission, none of the behavior at issue was for the purpose of influencing the 2020 presidential election.

“In my view, the record doesn’t establish whether Twitter was consistently enforcing a politically neutral business policy or using its platform to support one candidate over another. But I also think the answer to that question is ultimately irrelevant and therefore, I conclude Twitter is a publisher with a First Amendment right to control the content on its platform and to favor or disfavor certain speech and speakers.” He added.

That is really a clean fishy play. Shame on this Biden establishments.

Source: DailyWire

About The Author

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.