Whose Responsible For The Fake Biden Laptop?

Is the Deep State behind all this Hunter Biden’s laptop scandal?

Back in 2020, just three weeks before the election, a New York newspaper founded by Alexander Hamilton published a tabloid-style headline that read “Biden’s secret emails.”

Reporters for the New York Post examined emails, documents, and photos found on a laptop that appeared to belong to Hunter Biden, son of then-presidential candidate Joe Biden.

Then, some mainstream media pick up the scandalous laptop story. Along with New York Post, are the reporters from The Gateway Pundit, The Daily Mail, and many more.

Some of the photographs were lurid; the kind of stuff that would embarrass any family, not just one in the public eye. But the Post was most interested in correspondence that has taken on new significance in recent weeks. It was about Hunter Biden’s business dealings in Ukraine, which also seemed to involve his father.

The Gateway Pundit also posted one of the sickest stories claiming that Hunter set up a pornhub account and shared pictures of himself and a family member on the site.

The Gateway Pundit detailed the origin of the scandalous laptop:

The laptop was obtained by computer repairman John Paul Mac Isaac.  From him, the laptop took on a life of its own.  The FBI obtained the original laptop but recently shared that they did not know where it was.  The Assistant Director of cyber at the FBI claims he doesn’t know where it’s at.

In addition, reports from the other side of the globe assert that lots more data was found on the laptop.  We reported on this less than a week ago.  These reports claim that 450 GB of deleted content from the Hunter Biden laptop was found. This allegedly includes 80,000 images/videos and more than 120,000 archived emails.

However, John Paul Mac Isaac says this cannot be the case. He shared the following on Newsmax.

Watch it here: NewsmaxTV/Youtube

However, one explained that there is no way that 450GB of data could be located on the Hunter Biden laptop, agreeing with Isaac claim:

Due to the condition and stability of HB’s liquid damaged MacBook Pro, John Paul Mac Isaac was unable to perform a block recovery or a true clone of the drive. Instead, he performed a manual data copy from the intermittently powering off laptop. He was successful in recovering the contents of the user’s home folder, a total of around 220GB of data off the 256GB non-removable SSD.

Due to the differences between the original, more efficient APFS filesystem and the HFS+ filesystem used on the target 500GB SSD sent to Rudy Giuliani’s office, the size of the home folder ballooned to nearly 300GB.  The 500GB SSD reported 200GB free and 300GB used, even though there was only around 220GB of accessible data on it.  Because these were new SSDs and no other data was recovered besides the home folder, it would be impossible to recover ‘additional’ deleted files from Hunter Biden’s laptop.

On August 28 2020, John Paul MacIsaac overnighted a 500 GB external SSD drive with a copy of the HB laptop image to Rudy Giuliani’s office. At the time of shipment, Giuliani’s drive was about 60% full (300 GB/500 GB).

Claims that an additional 450 GB from the copy of the laptop drive is false because a copy based on a drive that originated from John Paul Mac Isaac’s image didn’t have this amount of storage capacity in the first place.  It is technically impossible to recover 450 GB of erased data from a 256 GB drive source.

When you delete a file from a computer, you are telling the OS to forget the location of that file on the drive, but the file is still there. It is possible to recover a deleted file as long as the OS hasn’t written new data over the file’s previous location. If 450 GB of data was un-deleted from the drive, that would leave 250 GB of data recovered beyond the original 500 GB drive capacity. The newly discovered 450 GB of data combined with the existing original 300 GB data would require the original copy of the drive to be at least 750 GB. The backup drive only had 500 GB.

Allegedly, some people and media outlets who have gained access to the scandalous laptop found out that Hunter’s laptop includes some sick child porn or something similar.

Then the corrupt FBI came into action because it is illegal to distribute this type of garbage, the FBI get involved and investigate everyone who had any contact with Hunter’s laptop to date in an effort to charge them with handling or distributing child porn.

The Gateway Pundit noted:

The list of individuals who have had access to data on Hunter Biden’s laptop is extensive.  It not only includes the publishers and reporters named above, but it also includes Rudi Giuliani and others who received the data.

Of note is that the data on Hunter’s laptop to date does not include pictures of child porn, that we have seen.  The laptop does have texts referring to Hunter’s actions with a minor.  There are also pictures of at least one minor on the laptop, but these pictures alone would not be considered child porn.  Any information to date showing Hunter with children was not found on the laptop and may have been inserted on the Net to muddy up the water.

An additional important note to date is that the individuals who have seen and possessed Hunter Biden’s laptop to date are not part of the Big Media establishment.  They all are conservatives who are seeking the truth.  Targeting those who saw or possessed Hunter’s laptop would be another attack on courageous Americans seeking the truth.

This all sounds like something the Deep State would do.

Sources: TheGatewayPundit, Yaacovapelbaum

More Reading

Post navigation

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *