You Might Like

When people say that they are going to give more than 100% at something, we know it is just a way of saying that they are going to do the best that they can.

We all know that it is impossible to give it more than you all. Well, except when it comes to voting apparently. It seems to be that the Democratic Party has done such a great job in the last election that somehow they got more people to vote in places than there were actual people.

You know, it’s like if you got a score of 302 in a game of bowling.

Emerging information from the states has rendered Biden’s premature victory less and less plausible.

Among the analysts who question the legitimacy of Biden’s alleged victory is Dr. Navid Keshavarz-Nia, a cybersecurity expert whose technical expertise was touted by the New York Times last September and who has been described as a hero in the Washington Monthly.

His damning analysis of the electronic manipulation of votes that occurred in the early hours of November 4 appears in a sworn affidavit included with C.J. Pearson v. Kemp, a lawsuit filed by Attorney Sidney Powell in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. His nine-page affidavit (Exhibit 26) describes how it is possible to manipulate votes, where this occurred, and sums up his findings as follows:

I conclude with high confidence that the election 2020 data were altered in all battleground states resulting in hundreds of thousands of votes that were cast for President Trump to be transferred to Vice President Biden. These alterations were the result of systemic and widespread exploitable vulnerabilities in DVS, Scytl/SOE Software and Smartmatic systems that enabled operators to achieve the desired results. In my view, the evidence is overwhelming and incontrovertible.

This examination of the election results, for example, uses quantitative analysis to identify some very odd anomalies in the 2020 vote patterns. But it isn’t necessary to be a sophisticated statistician or cybersecurity expert possessed of arcane knowledge of how voting machines operate to see that enough ballot fraud occurred to change the election results in several states.

Keshavarz-Nia provided his findings in a sworn affidavit, under penalty of perjury, which renders him highly credible.

Read More

About The Author

Related Posts

One Response

  1. ChuckB

    This has been a problem for many years. It’s nothing new that democrats bring in extra voters from outside the legal voting base. After Obama2, there were even interviews with people who actually were brought in from outside and they admitted they voted more than once, Wake the hell up people. This is NOT New. But RNC has blindly followed the DNC and MSM when they did the “pay no attention to that guy behind the curtain” shtick.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.